Spot adverse development across your book before the next review.

Track where severity, reserves and defence costs are moving across your complex Commercial Lines claims. See which claims are deteriorating, where reserve movements look unusual and what patterns are emerging by line, broker or panel firm.

Bring claim files, loss runs and bordereaux together, and trace every finding back to the records behind it. Your claims specialists decide what to escalate.

What changed since the last review, and what needs a decision.

On a sample casualty book of 412 open claims, Navi lists the seven files that changed since the last review, why each one matters, and the three that need a decision.

Casualty book · 412 open claims · UK and EuropeSince the review of 25 Sep 2026
Conversation with Navi
You

Which open claims changed materially since last week's review?

Navi

Seven files changed. Three need a decision.

  • Halden ThermalCover

    New claimant in Hamburg; injury date after the policy expired.

    German counsel letter · p. 2 · Claim form · p. 1
  • Ashby HaulageSeverity

    Second claimant from the same incident; medical report revised upward.

    Claimant solicitor letter · p. 1 · Medical report · p. 6
  • Lowfield ArchitectsLiability

    Expert now attributes the defect to design, not installation.

    Expert addendum · p. 9
Portfolio view · Since the last review

OPEN CLAIMS

7of 412 open claims with a material change
  • Defence cost estimates revised4 files · counsel reports+£640k
  • New claimants notified2 files · UK, Germany2
  • Coverage questions raised2 files · wording cited2
  • Over your escalation thresholdsReady for claims committee3

Pattern across the bookLowfield Architects and two other open files name the same contractor and allege the same defect.

From fragmented claim files to a current view of the book.

We set Parsewise up around the questions your claims reviews already ask.

Bring the records together

Claims notes, adjuster and expert reports, legal correspondence, policy documents, loss runs and bordereaux, plus case data from Workflows.

Set the indicators that matter

Agree with us which changes count as material, such as reserve movements, severity indicators, shifts in liability or coverage, and missing information.

Investigate from book to page

Start from the aggregate view, open the claim, then check the source page behind each finding.

Implementation and ongoing support

Four ways teams
use Analytics.

Start with what moved across your open claims. Use the same records to spot severity, reserve issues and bordereau gaps across the book.

Claims teams

See which open claims moved.

Navi reads the new reports and letters across your open claims, ranks the files that changed and links each reason to its page. Your claims lead decides what happens next.

Which open claims changed materially since last week's review?

What changed across open claims

Claims and reserving teams

Find the claims that need expert attention.

Analyse large claims datasets, reconcile paid, incurred and reserved figures, and identify emerging severity and the cases that need specialist review. Your claims lead checks the evidence and decides how to route them.

Which cases should a specialist review first?

Reserve and defence cost movements

Carriers, reinsurers and claims auditors

Check reported claims against the files.

Check bordereau figures against the underlying claim files, see where the figures and the evidence disagree, and focus reviews on the files that changed. Questions for the TPA or cedant come with the pages attached.

Where do the bordereau figures and the claim files disagree?

Delegated claims and bordereau checks

Run-off and M&A teams

Reconcile claims data across a portfolio.

Standardise fragmented loss runs, bordereaux and policy documents, reconcile figures down to individual claims, and investigate anomalies or missing information before drawing conclusions about the portfolio.

Which figures need reconciliation before we assess this portfolio?

Run-off and M&A due diligence
Also used by MGAs and underwriting teams
Compre

Claims reconciliation and portfolio diligence

Fragmented claims data, reconciled down to the claim.

Compre uses Parsewise to reconcile loss runs, bordereaux and policy documents down to individual claims. Anomalies and missing information are flagged for review.

Read the Compre story

Keep each claim current.
Watch the whole book.

Workflows keeps an individual claim up to date as new documents arrive, up to 500 pages per run. Analytics covers thousands of claims and builds on data from Workflows cases, so you're not waiting for the next formal review.

Navi is the assistant across both. Your team can work on the case and examine its place in the wider portfolio. Claims Intelligence runs on Analytics.

Your specialists stay in control.

Every finding links to its source page. Parsewise flags what's changed and what needs attention. Your claims team decides on coverage, reserves and escalation.

Analytics on Business and Enterprise.

Compare plans

Credits reflect the pages and extraction complexity.

Analytics uses credits based on the number of pages and the complexity of the information being extracted. Each extraction agent has a low, medium or high complexity setting, shown in the configurator.

Business and Enterprise include an annual credit allowance. We warn you at 80% of your annual allowance. Usage beyond the allowance is billed automatically as overage. Unused credits do not roll over.

We discuss your datasets and expected usage when scoping the plan. Workflows uses separate per-seat pricing with unlimited runs.

European hosting and model inference are standard. Business and Enterprise include MFA and SSO; Enterprise offers an optional virtual private cloud deployment.

Security and trust

What do you need to know about your book?

Tell us about the claims you handle and the questions your reviews keep returning to. We'll show you a relevant analysis, then scope a pilot on your own files.